Women in leadership roles navigate a unique set of communication challenges.
While they drive change and inspire teams, they often face scrutiny over how they express authority, emotion, and decisiveness. Female executives, politicians, and industry leaders must continuously balance assertiveness with approachability, often in ways their male counterparts do not.
One of the most persistent challenges is the fine line between being perceived as “too soft” or “too aggressive.” Lynne Welch, Community Engagement Manager at Homes NSW, emphasises the importance of self-awareness and integrity.
“I think the key is having a strong sense of self—knowing who I am, what I stand for, and having a clear understanding of my role as a leader and role model in a large organisation.”
She notes that balancing empathy with assertion is crucial to effective leadership.
Similarly, Alexandra Wake, an academic at RMIT University, acknowledges the struggle.
“Journalistic training makes us direct and results-focused. In a woman, that is seen as aggressive. In men, it is seen as decisive.”
This double standard forces many women to adjust their communication styles to be heard without being dismissed.
Another often-overlooked challenge is the expectation for women to adapt their communication styles to fit traditionally male-dominated leadership spaces. Sophie Winter, Manager of Content and Community at the Australian Wildlife Conservancy, points out the additional mental load this creates.
“Changing what comes naturally is tiresome, so this adds a layer of mental load on top of the workload, detracting from potential success.”
She highlights that finding a leadership voice requires a mix of trial and error, inspiration, and feedback. “A great boss introduced me to Kim Scott’s philosophy of ‘radical candor—caring personally while challenging directly,’ which really resonated and I use in my leadership approach.”
Read also: Data governance in the AI era
Public perception and executive communication present another challenge. Lynne reflects on the ongoing scrutiny of women’s professional appearance, noting that even her choice of attire has sparked unnecessary debate.
“I actually uploaded a video to my LinkedIn asking whether or not it is appropriate to wear overalls in an office due to the comments I had received (by men) about my attire.” The disproportionate attention to how female leaders present themselves speaks to the broader issue of gendered workplace expectations.
The ability to speak with authority without being labelled negatively is a shared concern among women leaders. Alexandra highlights the impact of gendered language in public discourse, pointing to the term “Karen” as a tool for dismissing women who speak up. “The whole idea of the ‘Karen’ means that if you present your views or complaints directly (and I don’t mean rudely), you can be dismissed easily rather than being recognised as someone solving an issue.”
Similarly, an anonymous leader adds, “A confident man is seen as a leader, while a confident woman can be called ‘too much.’”
Despite these challenges, women in leadership continue to shape narratives, inspire change, and redefine workplace norms. Their ability to communicate with clarity, confidence, and authenticity is crucial in fostering inclusive and effective leadership.
The conversation around gendered expectations in leadership must continue—because when women lead, they don’t just change organisations; they change the conversation itself.
Public Spectrum is the first knowledge-sharing platform in Australia to embrace the entire public sector. This website is a platform where you can connect, collaborate, empower, inspire, and upskill with public sector professionals.
Latest
Popular