As artificial intelligence (AI) rapidly integrates into government functions, Australian regulatory bodies like the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) spearhead initiatives to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework. This initiative guarantees the ethical, safe, and beneficial use of AI technologies for society, especially in the public sector. Regulators are implementing measures to address growing concerns about the potential dangers of AI, including data security, privacy, and the ethical implications of automated decision-making.

AI holds transformative potential that is undeniable. This initiative will transform service delivery, optimise operations, and improve decision-making in the public sector. Nonetheless, the inherent characteristics of AI, especially innovations like generative AI, data science, data analytics, and data modeling, along with its dependence on cloud storage, demand thoughtful evaluation.

As Joe Longo, Chair of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), stated at the UTS Human Technology Institute Shaping Our Future Symposium, “Existing laws likely do not adequately prevent AI-facilitated harms before they occur, and more work is needed to ensure there is an adequate response to harms after they occur.” 

This highlights the urgent need to link current regulations with the rapidly evolving AI landscape. The current framework of regulations, including laws on privacy, online safety, corporate conduct, intellectual property, and anti-discrimination, fails to address the unique challenges posed by artificial intelligence.

Longo further emphasised, “The responsibility towards good governance is not changed just because the technology is new.” This underscores the importance of applying existing principles to AI deployments while simultaneously developing specific regulations for this rapidly evolving field. ASIC’s ongoing review into the use of AI in the banking, credit, insurance, and advice sectors exemplifies this approach, aiming to understand “the actual AI use cases being deployed and developed in the Australian market – and how they impact consumers.”

Check out: “Strengthening AI adoption for digital governance”

Key sectors that require robust regulatory frameworks include:

• Transparency and explainability: AI systems, especially intricate models used in benefit allocation, loan approvals, or predictive policing, must maintain transparency and ensure that their decision-making processes are clearly understandable. When an AI system denies a citizen access to a social benefit, the individual must understand the factors that influenced the decision. Without transparency, individuals may encounter a lack of due process, and biases embedded in the algorithms might go unnoticed, leading to unfair outcomes. This situation significantly undermines public confidence in governmental systems and their perceived equity.
• Data governance and security: Data fundamentally drives artificial intelligence. Comprehensive data governance frameworks safeguard sensitive information used in public services, including health records and tax information. They also ensure the integrity of the data by incorporating aspects of data governance, cybersecurity, and network security. AI-powered systems can lead to data breaches that compromise citizens’ personal information, resulting in identity theft and various other risks. Effective data governance practices tackle concerns like data minimisation by collecting only essential data and purpose limitation by ensuring that data is used solely for its intended purpose. It must ensure public confidence and adhere to privacy laws as a top priority.
• Ethical considerations: AI systems that are used in criminal justice risk assessment and self-driving cars need to come up with and follow a strong code of ethics to avoid bias and unfair results. An AI-based risk assessment tool in the justice system could make societal biases stronger, which would mean that some groups would have different outcomes. Ethical guidelines must tackle concerns such as fairness, accountability, and human oversight. This ensures that AI systems foster justice and equity, rather than worsen current inequalities.
• Accountability and redress: Establishing clear lines of accountability for decisions driven by AI in public sector operations is essential. People impacted by AI systems should access mechanisms for redress. When an AI-driven system makes an error that causes a citizen to lose access to essential services, it is crucial to create a transparent process that enables the individual to challenge the decision and seek appropriate remedies. Clear accountability and redress mechanisms empower individuals to address harm caused by AI. Without them, public trust in these technologies may erode, leading to potential legal challenges. This includes clear responsibility for creating, implementing, and continuously overseeing the AI.

Enhanced AI governance underscores the critical need to harmonise technological progress with responsible management. The authorities emphasise that, while AI offers significant advantages, its unregulated implementation may lead to unforeseen outcomes that jeopardise consumer confidence and the integrity of the financial system. Australia’s public sector will establish a framework to enhance transparency, accountability, and security in AI applications. 

Policymakers, industry leaders, and technology experts must work together to develop regulations that effectively address risks and promote responsible innovation. Current discussions about AI governance shape Australia’s approach to balancing technological advancement with ethical obligations. This paves the way for a future where AI benefits the public and upholds trust and integrity in governmental functions.

Justin Lance Marcel Lavadia

+ postsBio

Justin Lavadia is a content producer and editor at Public Spectrum with a diverse writing background spanning various niches and formats. With a wealth of experience, he brings clarity and concise communication to digital content. His expertise lies in crafting engaging content and delivering impactful narratives that resonate with readers.

• Justin Lance Marcel Lavadia

  https://publicspectrum.co/author/justine-lavadia/

  Safeguarding public safety with data protection
• Justin Lance Marcel Lavadia

  https://publicspectrum.co/author/justine-lavadia/

  Empowering development skills for Australia’s digital future
• Justin Lance Marcel Lavadia

  https://publicspectrum.co/author/justine-lavadia/

  AI sparks risks, reinforces cybersecurity
• Justin Lance Marcel Lavadia

  https://publicspectrum.co/author/justine-lavadia/

  Big data drives social impact