Treasurer Jim Chalmers is betraying Australian households by trying to give away the Treasurer’s power to overrule the Reserve Bank’s interest rate decisions in legislation currently before a Senate enquiry.

Instead, Australians should demand he use the power to save households and force the RBA to cut interest rates to relieve the crushing financial pressure that has plunged record numbers of households into mortgage stress.

The Australian Citizens Party (ACP) is calling on Australians to make submissions to the current Senate Economics Legislation Committee enquiry into the RBA Reforms bill, demanding the Treasurer’s veto power be used, not removed.

ACP Research Director Robert Barwick said today: “What do you call a fireman who refuses to fight a house fire but instead tries to destroy the fire hose to sabotage the firefighting effort? An arsonist.

“The Treasurer is the economic fireman: Chalmers has the power to protect households from the fire of rising interest rates, but not only is he refusing to use his power to do so, he’s trying to sabotage the power by legislating it away so neither he nor any future Treasurer can use it.
“He’s pretending to be a fireman, but he’s burning Australia’s households! ”

The ACP charges that not only is Chalmers betraying Australian households, he’s also betraying the legacy of his own Labour Party predecessors, John Curtin and Ben Chifley, who in the 1930s and 1940s fought for and implemented this power precisely so the Treasurer could protect the people from brutal banker-imposed austerity, as suffered in the Great Depression.

When Chifley served on the 1936–37 Banking Royal Commission, he argued against raising interest rates on indebted households to control inflation.

“I disagree with the contention often made that the raising of interest rates is a suitable or effective method of checking undesirable expansion [i.e. inflation],” he wrote in his dissenting comments to the final report. “In my opinion, this end can better be achieved by restricting the volume of advances [loans].”

In 1945, Curtin and Chifley legislated for the Treasurer to have the power to overrule the interest rate decisions of the Commonwealth Bank, which was the central bank back then.

They also legislated for the Commonwealth Bank to have the power to determine the lending policy of private banks, so the Commonwealth Bank could restrict lending to economic activities that were causing inflation.

In 1959, when Robert Menzies split off the central banking function of the Commonwealth Bank into the Reserve Bank, he retained both powers in Section 11 of the Reserve Bank Act 1959 (the Treasurer’s veto) and in Section 36 of the Banking Act 1959 (the RBA’s power to direct the lending policy of private banks).

These are the two sections Jim Chalmers is trying to repeal in his Treasury Laws Amendment (Reserve Bank Reforms) Bill 2023!

In the face of the inflation crisis, which Australian households didn’t cause but which they are being punished for through the most rapid interest rate hikes in history, Chalmers should not be removing these powers; he should be using them!

The Treasurer should:

1. Order the RBA to lower interest rates by between 1 and 2 percentage points (100-200 basis points) to give immediate relief to indebted households in mortgage stress; and simultaneously
2. Order the RBA to direct the private banks to heavily restrict lending to investors, including foreign investors, to ensure the reduction of interest rates doesn’t fuel more investor speculation in housing that makes house prices unaffordable for genuine homebuyers.

Robert Barwick said, “Chalmers have the power to save households. Now’s the time it must be used, not removed.”

Justin Lance Marcel Lavadia

+ posts

Justin Lavadia is a content producer and editor at Public Spectrum with a diverse writing background spanning various niches and formats. With a wealth of experience, he brings clarity and concise communication to digital content. His expertise lies in crafting engaging content and delivering impactful narratives that resonate with readers.

• AI laws to strengthen public data security
• Laws to enhance digital data security resilience
• Enhancing public services through data management
• Safeguarding data privacy in national infrastructure