The Senate enquiry into bank closures in regional Australia holds its 13th and final public hearing on Bribie Island, Queensland. The hearing is expected to attract a large public audience of Queensland locals incensed at the actions of the banks.

Representatives of the Australian Citizens Party (ACP) will attend the hearing, as they have done at every landmark inquiry that has accumulated copious evidence of the damaging impact branch closures have had on communities all across Australia.

Unveiling the banks’ deceptions

ACP Research Director Robert Barwick said the enquiry has exposed the banks’ lies.

“The banks and their lobbyist, Australian Banking Association CEO Anna Bligh, claim that customers aren’t using branches any more and that they are simply following the choices of customers to bank online,” Barwick said.

“The way the banks talked, the public assumed they were closing branches because they were unprofitable. 

“This enquiry has exposed those claims as false.”

The Senators have seen the true nature of Australia’s Big Four banks, Barwick observed.

“Banks are akin to a utility, operating with a social licence that comes with reciprocal responsibilities,” Barwick said.

“But Australia’s Big Four banks have abandoned their social responsibilities to pursue a digital agenda that maximises their profits at the expense of Australian consumers and the economy.

“The enquiry has received evidence that a full quarter of Australians are not digitally included, as measured by the Digital Inclusion Index, which means that for various reasons, they do not have the ability to bank online.

“These include the elderly, the disabled, immigrant and indigenous communities, and many regional and remote communities that have unreliable internet connectivity.

“But the banks do not care about these millions of Australians, as they have forged ahead with closing branches en masse across Australia.

“Branch closures have damaged both metropolitan and regional communities, but, giving the lie to the banks’ claim that they are following their customers’ preferences, their branch closures have had a disproportionate impact on regional Australia, where digital inclusion is lowest.”

Rising backlash against cashlessness

Barwick said that the real proof that the banks have been lying is the huge public backlash against branch closures and the loss of cash, which is why the Senate established the enquiry.

“Australians are getting sick of the cashless agenda the banks are pushing,” he said.

“Protests like the enormously successful ‘Cash Out Tuesday’ on 2 April demonstrated the anger that’s out there, but the latest Reserve Bank figures for February show cash withdrawals from ATMs were already rising significantly before the protest, as Australians are voting with their feet for saving cash.

“The banks know what it means because Anna Bligh has gone into damage control, giving interviews claiming that the ‘banks have no desire to see cash disappear’, yet the entire reason this is an issue is because the banks have systematically and ruthlessly taken away the means to access and bank cash by mass-closing branches and ripping out ATMs.

“For example, a year ago, a 28 April Australian Financial Review article, ‘Banks cull branches in shift to a cashless society’, showed executives from each of the Big Four boasting of their methods to push customers away from cash.

“The public is waking up to what the banks are doing and is expressing their anger, which is why you can expect a large audience for tomorrow’s hearing.”

The ACP advocates for the government to solve the problem of banks closing branches and forcing customers to go cashless by establishing a new public bank to operate in post offices.

Editors Publicspectrum

Website | + posts

Public Spectrum is the first knowledge-sharing platform in Australia to embrace the entire public sector. This website is a platform where you can connect, collaborate, empower, inspire, and upskill with public sector professionals.

• AI enhances ethical data privacy
• Digital government implements responsible AI strategy
• Improving personal data protection standards
• AI transforms government data handling