The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has expressed urgent concerns about the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) by financial service and credit licensees, highlighting the necessity for strong governance frameworks to mitigate emerging risks. In its latest market review, Chair Joe Longo emphasised the importance of governance structures that can adapt to the rapid advancements in AI. He warned, “There is potential for a governance gap—one that risks widening if AI adoption outpaces governance in response to competitive pressures.”

Boosting AI governance

ASIC’s regulatory guidance highlights four essential areas vital for responsible AI adoption: governance frameworks, consumer protection, ethical data management, and continuous monitoring. These elements not only support the financial industry but also influence Australia’s digital government initiatives and data management practices in the public sector.

1. Strengthening governance frameworks

ASIC’s findings indicate that while 60% of surveyed licensees plan to increase their AI usage, nearly half do not have sufficient governance policies addressing fairness, bias, and transparency. Longo pointed out that without prompt governance improvements, “we risk seeing misinformation, unintended discrimination or bias, manipulation of consumer sentiment, and data security and privacy failures.” By enhancing governance, ASIC seeks to boost consumer confidence and uphold market integrity, which are critical for digital government frameworks managing sensitive data.

2. Protecting consumers and ensuring fairness

A primary concern for ASIC is protecting consumers from potential harm caused by AI-driven financial tools. Currently, fewer than half of licensees have implemented measures that ensure fairness and transparency in their AI systems. ASIC insists that licensees must take proactive steps to align their AI practices with “existing consumer protection provisions, director duties, and licensee obligations.” This consumer-focused approach establishes a benchmark for data transparency, a critical element in digital governance policies where trust and ethical standards are essential for public-facing AI applications.

3. Ethical data management and bias prevention

AI systems’ reliance on extensive data sets increases the risk of bias and privacy concerns. ASIC’s guidelines advocate for proactive measures, urging financial institutions to conduct “proper and ongoing due diligence to mitigate third-party AI supplier risk.” This directive extends beyond the private sector, as Australian public agencies increasingly use AI to manage citizen data. ASIC’s emphasis on ethical data use and bias reduction aligns with broader digital government initiatives aimed at ensuring fairness and accountability in AI-driven services.

4. Ongoing monitoring and accountability

In its corporate plan, ASIC underscored the importance of continuous monitoring of AI use in financial services, stating it “will take enforcement action if appropriate and where necessary” to tackle any misconduct. This commitment to oversight not only promotes responsible AI practices within the financial sector but also provides a framework that digital government entities can adopt for consistent monitoring of AI systems in public administration.

Improving digital governance

ASIC’s emphasis on responsible AI adoption significantly impacts digital government and data management in Australia’s public sector. By advocating for robust AI governance frameworks, ASIC encourages public sector agencies to implement similar practices, thereby promoting transparency, accountability, and ethical considerations in government services and decision-making.

Their focus on consumer protection and fairness in AI applications sets a benchmark for public sector agencies, fostering the development of AI systems that are unbiased, non-discriminatory, and prioritise citizens’ well-being. Furthermore, ASIC’s commitment to data security and privacy underscores the importance of safeguarding sensitive citizen information, prompting public sector agencies to adopt strong data protection measures and comply with privacy regulations. Effective AI governance also enhances market confidence by ensuring that AI technologies are used ethically and transparently.

By prioritising strong governance and consumer protection, ASIC’s regulatory guidance on AI offers a roadmap that can significantly shape digital governance and data management within Australia’s public sector. These guidelines demonstrate a commitment to responsible AI use, ensuring safety, transparency, and ethical data handling. This foundational approach fosters the trust essential for effective AI applications in both the private and public sectors.

Justin Lance Marcel Lavadia

+ posts

Justin Lavadia is a content producer and editor at Public Spectrum with a diverse writing background spanning various niches and formats. With a wealth of experience, he brings clarity and concise communication to digital content. His expertise lies in crafting engaging content and delivering impactful narratives that resonate with readers.

• AI laws to strengthen public data security
• Laws to enhance digital data security resilience
• Enhancing public services through data management
• Safeguarding data privacy in national infrastructure